Can't Believe a Word of It!

Knee jerk reactions, no matter what side of the fence they originate on, continue to be defined primarily by the term "jerk". Years of brainwashing have apparently led many of us to believe that anything that is printed is fact. It used to take a while for the printed word to reach the more credulous of us but thanks to the wonderfully rapid aspects of the Internet truth and falsehood appear with equal speed and indiscriminate respectability. But that same Internet can and does provide the means to filter through the VOLUME and attempt to reach the ESSENCE.

I fear I have angered people I respect and admire for their many contributions to the community they live in; people who don't have the desire to transmit falsehood; people who truly believe they are "doing the right thing" by passing on information which proves that they are correct to take the stand they take on any given subject by pointing out to them that they are contributing to spreading false information in the best of circumstances and outright slander in the worst of the circumstances.

The least dangerous of these cases are the multitudes of emails we collectively receive pleading for us to pass on the picture of the poor little girl or boy who is dying of cancer in a remote hospital and whose parents lack the funds to save the beloved child's life. Of course, Microsoft and AOL have agreed to contribute toward the treatment of the poor child ONLY if they can squeeze a profit out of it and so you are urged to not be cold-hearted and pass the email on to everyone in your address book. It only takes a moment to either spread this urban legend or go to snopes.com and find out that if you do you will be contributing to wasted time, wasted bandwidth and worst of all, the pilfering of empathy and the sincere desire to help someone.

Of the same ilk but much more mean spirited are the rash of emails that take a tiny bit of truth as yarn and knit a wildly incongruous and untrue tale that usually pits the fears of one political faction against another.

The clue is to follow to look beyond the obvious. What does the originator of the email want to achieve? What is the agenda of the originator? Don't judge the sender's objective since the sender is probably a victim of Internet Abuse. They may well be your colleague, friend or family member. You hesitate to correct them because you don't want to seem patronizing or create conflict where nothing but friendship resides. But please; find a diplomatic way of having them look beyond the obvious. Send them this blog if you think it will help!

A recent email claimed that the left was proposing banning the American Flag. Research showed that the "truth" was that a school in LA had banned the wearing of clothing sporting the American Flag ONE DAY (5 de Mayo) to avoid conflict. Fox News spun this event into a online survey titled "Should the American Flag Be Banned -- in America?" which was then spun by others to claim that the left was supporting the banning of the American flag. Massive emails went out to ask the conservatives to show the liberals the true tenor of the American people.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/06/american-flag-banned-america/#ixzz16QrIZa2L

The sad reality is that we have become too eager to react without checking facts. Are we too complacent to check our facts or too secure in our own limited collection of knowledge to risk seeing beyond what we currently accept as truth? Knee jerk or just jerks?

Petition to Rush Limbaugh

The recent content of Mr. Rush Limbaugh's nationally syndicated radio program has irked many and provided him with even more fodder for his negative approach to program content. Many of us believe that party affiliation has nothing to do with patriotism; that constructive criticism is crucial to building sound platforms and a future that will sustain the promise of American freedom of thought, speech and the pursuit of happiness. Destructive criticism, on the other hand, is employed solely to ensure that the noise created by the criticizer is heard at a greater distance. Please consider copying the petion you will find below and sending it to those on your mailing list. Mr. Limbaugh loves to pound his chest concerning the large number of people who listen to him. Perhaps we can make him listen to a large number of people too.

Petition to Mr. Rush Limbaugh
Please be quiet. Please take a solemn moment and consider history, consider where the nation you purport to love finds itself at this moment. There are many things you and each of us CAN do. We the undersigned, hope that you will choose to be quiet. We hope that you will recognize that wishing for the failure of your president is NOT patriotic. We hope that you will recognize that creating dissention and vitriol is NOT patriotic. We hope that you will recognize that what you identify as humor and wit is nothing more than cynical anger that is often vulgar. We hope that you will recognize that calling women "babes" and environmentalists "whackos" plays to the lowest component of your audience but fully defines the height of your cultural contribution to our national reality. We the undersigned do not wish to silence dissent, we do not wish to eliminate authentic voices of conservative reason, and we do not wish to pretend that all is well or that the current government can do no wrong. Our sole wish is to recognize that the severity of our present situation demands that the majority of us pull together in the same direction, that the painful sacrifices we make today will protect us from greater, deeper sacrifices tomorrow and that fertilizing acrimony is not conducive to healing. Rush Limbaugh; PLEASE BE QUIET. Your mouth is the source of much of the fertilizer.

Please, be quiet.

Gender Gyrations

Wearing skirts has just become de rigeur in the Republican party. Did anyone else notice that all the important women who addressed the convention were clad in very nice, gam disclosing dresses or suits? Nothing androgenous or reminiscent of the Hillary Clinton Pantsuit Pandemonium! No pantsuits in this crowd...Thanks to the interested viewpoint of the cameramen I got to see many DOM bearing lapel buttons that proudly proclaimed "Hoosiers for the Hot Chick." Way to go, old dudes! You have unthroned the proud poser of questionable questions, the "chick" who asked Clinton if he prefered jockeys over boxers! How enlightening that the "conservatives", defenders of all that is moral, religious and patriotic in our great nation have found that resorting to good, old fashioned sexism is the best way to support their candidate for the Vice Presidency.

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum it is undeniable that Senator McCain did a remarkable job in his selection of a running mate. I say this not based on her qualifications, though I think there are many; not based on her politcal wisdom, though I am convinced she has a solid supply; not based on her youth and attractiveness, though that is obvious...I say this based on the how much positive effervescence has been caused by her nomination. As far as charisma and ability to cause excitement goes, Obama had McCain flat out like a pancake. There was no way McCain could have ever hoped to garner even a small percentage of the visibility that Obama takes for granted. Obama sneezes and there is a new flash in Australia. McCain could have fallen down a flight of stairs in women's underwear and barely have been noticed. And this absence of visibility was a built in black hole for the Republican Party...any message McCain wanted to get out to the light was being sucked in to the black hole!

Until Sarah.

Sarah is the center of attention, not only because of what she brings to the table in her own right, but because of what HE DOESN'T. She is celebrated because she is clearly defined in who and what she is, HE ISN'T. Is McCain a liberal conservative or a conservative liberal? Is he an independent aligned with the right or homeless Democrat whose only port in the storm was the Republicans? There is no doubt that he is a respectable man who endured great pain and indignities for his country, but he lacks a clear, identifiable personna that allows the voter to get to know him. Sarah is his solution to this lackluster predicament.

And while the conservative right rejoices in the excitement caused by this formidable woman, let the rest of us remember that her bright smile and painted pit bull tenacity only dress up the fact that she has chosen to cast her lot with a party that is more dictatorial than republican.

Personally, I find the upcoming months cannot help but be the most entertaining politically; it will be great fun to watch a true Washington outsider transform before our very eyes and become the very thing she has spent her life NOT being!

The Marketing of Hope

Does Barack Obama need another commentary from a Blogger? Not really. But I can't help myself. As I read the myriad collection of sage ponderances on his candidacy, pro and con I cannot help but think that everyone is missing the point.

Oh, really? What do I see that others do not? How arrogant of me! How presumptious! Well, maybe it is just a tad presumptious, but I have the advantage of a perspective that is perhaps fresher than that of many pundits. Sometimes I feel like a modern day Rip Van Winkle; returning to the United States to discover that so much has evolved differently than one would have expected. Of course, unlike Rip separation by sleep is not the issue. While aware of the controversies and the punditry going on it was always from a perspective of an outsider looking in.

Even from that vantage point there developed a perspective of the sad demise of confidence. The American people have lost confidence in so many things throughout the years. We are skeptical about just about everything. We no longer believe what is told to us. We can't believe what major companies tell us because look at what Enron and others have done with our willingness to believe. We can't trust bankers because look what their greed has done to the housing industry. We have lost trust in our priests, our teachers, the safety of tomatoes and jalapeños, cranes, bridges, tunnels, vaccinations, health insurance, hurricane insurance, and emails from Nigeria wanting to make us millionairs. We certainly can't trust what the government tells us because (now here the list is too long so I've just chosen a few examples) they really did conduct experiments on innocent people in Tuskegee, voter registration really was tainted in the South, they really did support Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan, he really did have an affair with THAT woman, there really weren't any weapons of mass destruction, there really wasn't any sniper fire to duck from ... Like the elephant in the room there is mass awareness of the death of confidence but everyone is just tip-toeing around the cadaver, hoping no one will have the audacity to mention the rotting carcass in the corner.

Along comes Barack Obama and he speaks to the the vacuum of ideology that this skepticism has created. We WANT to believe in the American Dream; we WANT to have hope in ourselves, in our government, in our future but THEY keep doing things that make it hard to keep the faith! He verbalizes ... and does it so well ... what so many of the American people want to hear and believe. He speaks to our collective need to once again believe that those in power can use the power for the greater good not just for their personal greater power. There certainly IS audacity in hope when the tangible evidence diminishes hope and doom and gloom is the message of the day on every possible communication venue.

His oratory inspires, uplifts and upholds the aspirations not just of our own people but of people around the world! Obama's recent International tour; certainly the first time the International scene has been used as stumping ground for US voters, has thrust the viability of his candidacy upon the citizens of other nations. As reported by William Kristol in the New York Times the chief editor of Der Spiegel's foreign desk stated, " Anyone who saw Barack Obama at Berlin's Siegessaeule on Thursday could recognize that this man will become the 44th president of the United States." Pretty impressive, eh? 200,000 Germans were wowed by a young candidate for president! But, why is a candidate for the highest office in the United States campaigning in Europe?

So what is the point that I think others are missing? Simply put, I fear that we are too eager to fill the void that the death of confidence has left and that we are getting carried away by euphemisms, oratorical flourish and our yearning for a return to the days where we believed what we were told. There is something to be said for experience. Idealism is only as good as the means by which it is implemented. Having great ideals and being effective are two very different things. "A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage" wasn't a quote from Roosevelt but from Hoover in 1928. Those living in "Hoovervilles" learned how unreal the idealism of Hoover economics turned out to be.

Like many others...I WANT to believe but there is a funny feeling in my gut that tells me something just isn't right here. Something smacks of too good to be true.

Hmmmmm.

Conservative or Liberal?

So, here I am in Texas...living close to Austin which is touted as being a liberal oasis in the vast conservative spaces of this gigantic state. I thought it would be important to be in a liberal community since I have always thought of myself as liberal. Why? Well, because I believe in the individual's right to the pursuit of happiness and too many of the things which bring happiness are rejected by the conservatives. It's that simple. My view of conservatives is one of a group of unhappy people bent on making others as unhappy as they are, assuaged only by the pursuit of capital gains. They believe themselves to be the anointed ones, in sole possession of the truth religious or otherwise. They are either sincerely convinced that any deviation from their interpretation of the truth is a sure and just road to Hell or they are equally convinced that strict adherence to the appearance of sincere passion for limiting the choices of others is a sure path to success.

Being Liberal has always meant to me that one was willing to live and let live...to embrace that one person's pursuit of happiness is not equal to another person's but that each individual is guaranteed the right to pursue whatever flavor of happiness they see fit. In the recognition of the individual's right to an opinion or belief that may be dramatically different from one's own lives the sweetness of loving your neighbor as you love yourself, of being willing to help others when they are in need of help because rather than passing judgement on others' choices one need simply acknowledge a real and present need.

All pretty much theoretical because quite frankly the application of the labels had never been applied in real life U.S. political nowness until the present election year because I lived outside of the continental US and my understanding of these labels had never been put to any test.

Never having been much of a fan of labels to begin with, the dizzying aspect of trying to label an individual's conscience based on an ever moving target defining political parties seems insane to me. Theoretically. But come November I will be entering a voting booth to participate in the election of our next President so like it or not I had better get a grip on some of these labels.

I have been exposed to many different views of what Liberal and Conservative means since returning to the States. Sadly, the most verbose and voluminous array of definitions come from the ultra conservative media. How is it that the liberals have allowed the conservatives to define them? It offends my ideals that liberal is equated with leftist, socialist or communist. It is offensive to hear that to be religious you MUST be the Religious Right, or that if you are liberal you are invested in losing the war in Iraq. It is nefarious, to me, to have the "spin-sters" tell the world that my choice in political direction makes me un-American and a danger to the future of the nation. I am awed by the conclusion that anyone who fears that the collective effects of man's presence on Earth may endanger the safety of the planet is by definition a "Whacko". For the first time in humanity's existence we have had the knowledge to understand that climate change is happening, whether it is of our making or not, but trying to do something about it is apparently a communist plot of the new world order. This is very unreal to me.

So help me out. Here are some of the things I believe in...where would you put them?

1. I believe that matters of conscience cannot be dictated by laws. Taking a life is not a matter of conscience, but determining when life starts...at conception or latter IS. Approving the RIGHT to an abortion does not mean that I approve OF abortion. It means that I approve of one's right to make a mistake. Either a mistake by getting pregnant or a mistake by eliminating the pregnancy. Apparently that makes me a liberal.
   
2. I believe that parents should actually relate to their children rather than simply being related to them; they should be involved in their lives, shape their choices by helping them understand the consequences of their actions and allowing them suffer the consequences when the need arises. Apparently this makes me a conservative.


3. I believe that the best case scenario for #2 is one loving mother and one loving father. Unfortunately, this is not always possible. Life happens. But the consistent factor is LOVE. One loving mother or father is better than none, and two loving mothers or two loving fathers is better than a dysfunctional mother and an incompetent father. Apparently this makes me a liberal.


4. I believe in being personally responsible for one's decisions and one's choices in life. A drinker or a smoker must be accountable for the sum of their choices. A thief, whether it is money, credit or identity that is being stolen should suffer the consequences of the crime committed. Equally, a hardworking, dedicated individual should be able to enjoy the fruits of their labor. Apparently, this makes me a conservative.


5. I believe that the state of an individual is not always attributable to the sum of their choices. Children are born into dysfunctional families and become dysfunctional students out of no fault of their own. Families are split apart by financial difficulties borne of illness, overall economic downturns and other situations that are not of their making. These people, who for all I know could be me someday, deserve access to tools that will allow them to survive, flourish and renew. Apparently this makes me a liberal.


6. I believe that mistaking lack of motivation and neediness for true need creates a weaker individual who in turn creates more weak individuals. Many people in need are only victims of their own choices and decisions and should be held accountable for those choices. Apparently that makes me a conservative.


7. I believe that those who are enriched by the labor of others should share their good fortune proportionally based on the effort, capital invested, creativity, etc. that created the wealth. Apparently this makes me a liberal.


8. I believe that entrepreneurs take risks that employees do not and that Capitalism provides greater reward for greater risk. Income derived from employment requires little more risk than the continued success of the employer. And while no employee should be taken advantage of, neither should any employer be unfairly exploited just because they may have more capital than their employees. Apparently, this makes me a conservative.
   
9. I believe that Capitalism and Greed are not synonyms but that too often they have become fused and confused , aided by the jargon of talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh who manipulate the concepts to equate Capitalism with an American right to waste and excess; as if this is somehow a trait to be applauded and lauded as patriotic. Apparently this makes me a liberal.


10. I believe the forefathers were bent on creating a community of faithful who could worship God as they saw fit. As such, belief in God was an important element that guided the hands, hearts and minds of the creation of our nation. Re-writing history to pretend that separation of Church and State somehow was meant to provide freedom FROM religion or to deny the reality of its import in our communal beginnings is foolish and wrong. Apparently this makes me a conservative.


11. I believe that the world we live in today is a very different place than it was at the time of the framing of the Constitution and that the spirit of the meaning of freedom of religion has only changed enough to allow embracing ALL of humanity's various ways of worship. Inclusion vs. exclusion. Apparently this makes me a liberal.


12. I believe that the concept of the "majority rules" is the backbone of democracy. If the decision of the majority somehow offends the sensibilities of the minority it is up to the minority to use the tools of reason and education to affect the decision but not to impose the will of the minority on the majority. Apparently this makes me a conservative.


13. I believe that government should provide its citizens with national safety and security including protection from any collective means of spreading harm from forces of power; internal or external. Apparently this makes me a liberal.


14. I believe that citizenship is not to be taken lightly; it requires sacrifice and understanding of our government's structure underscored by the history that created it. I believe that it is the responsibility of each citizen to feel passion for their country, for the process that gives it continual life; to discern between politics and public service. I believe that Patriotism is not a collection of words but a series of actions and I believe that the further we drift from the origins of our nation, the more the world grieves for us because the world has benefited from our success. What does that make me?

Confused. That much I know.